ONLINE EXCLUSIVES

A Man-Made Diamond Is Forever, Too: Nitty-gritty

August 31, 2011

Reading time min

Q: I'd like to know the differences in environmental impact between mined diamonds and those that are lab-created. Besides the obvious social upsides (avoiding war-torn producer countries, child labor in mines, etc.), what are the environmental benefits?

Asked by Gordon Haupt, MS ’91, PhD ’96, Oakland, Calif.


Greenhouse Gas Comparison of Natural and Lab-Created Diamonds

Unfortunately, detailed environmental data are not available for most diamond mines. However, BHP Billiton's Ekati mine in Canada has published its data, and it has received the Gold Champion Level from the Canadian Greenhouse Gas Challenge Registry. Here are BHP Billiton's data for fiscal year 2008.

Emissions (metric
 tons CO2 equivalent)
195,179
Approximate rough
 diamond yield
 (carats)
3,000,000
Pounds per metric ton 2,205
Emissions (lbs CO2
 equivalent) per carat
195,179 / 3,000,000 * 2,205 = 143


While 143 pounds per carat is a lot less than the emissions of two people flying roundtrip from New York to Cancun for their honeymoon (1,944 pounds), the mine's emissions total does not reflect the ecosystem damage, habitat loss, or other negative environmental impacts that can result from mining operations.

Here's a look at lab-created diamonds made in Gemesis's Sarasota, Florida headquarters:

Energy use (kWh) per carat 20
Emissions (lbs CO2 equivalent)
per MWh in Sarasota, Florida
 (Zip Code 34240)
1,319
kWh per MWh 1,000
Emissions (lbs CO2 equivalent)
 per carat
20 * 1,319 / 1000 = 26


While Gemesis currently only produces colored diamonds, 26 pounds per carat is still less than one-fifth of the carbon dioxide emissions resulting from mining diamonds at Ekati! Now suppose that every diamond produced in Ekati in FY2008 were instead replaced by a lab-grown Gemesis diamond.

Energy use (kWh)
 per carat
(carats)
3,000,000
Emissions savings (lbs
CO2 equivalent) per carat
 for lab-created vs. mined
143 - 26 = 117
Miles per gallon
(2009 U.S. CAFE Standard
 for Passenger Cars)
27.5
Car emissions from gasoline
(lbs CO2 per gallon)
20
Driving miles saved
by switching from
 mining to lab-creation
3,000,000 * 117 * 27.5 / 20 = 483 Million


Replacing this one mine's annual diamond production with synthetic diamonds created in a lab could save the equivalent of about 483 million miles' worth of auto emissions!

Traditional Diamond Mining

Natural diamonds are created in an environment of high pressure and temperature deep in the earth's crust in places inaccessible to miners. However, some diamonds are pushed up closer to the surface by volcano-feeding lava corridors called kimberlite pipes.

Diamonds are also sometimes found in river and lakebeds. Depending on the source rock and location, natural diamond mining is done via open pit mining of kimberlite pipes, through underwater mining of the seabed, or by the small-scale digging and searching of artisanal miners.

According to official statistics released by countries that participate in the Kimberley Process for diamond certification (see below), the leading producers of uncut "rough" diamonds by weight in 2008 were Russia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Botswana. While the U.S. Geological Survey does not track gem-quality diamond reserves, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Botswana, and Australia are estimated to have the world's greatest industrial diamond reserves.

Kimberley Process

The diamond trade has been a factor in recent civil wars in Angola, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Côte d'Ivoire, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. In 2000, the United Nations produced a resolution calling for a "rough" (uncut) diamond certification organization in order to stop the flow of conflict diamonds, which were being smuggled and sold to fund these civil wars and rebellions. As a result, the Kimberley Process has been used since 2003 to certify rough diamonds as conflict-free and to prevent member countries from trading diamonds with non-members. Currently, the Kimberley process has 48 active members. In a 2006 report evaluating the Kimberley Process, international NGO Global Witness found that the process had greatly increased legitimate diamond exports but warned that there were still gaps in the system.

Synthetic Diamonds

The technology for making small industrial diamonds in the lab has existed for more than a half century. However, companies are now using two different types of techniques to make larger gem-quality diamonds.

Apollo Diamond uses a process called chemical vapor deposition to grow diamonds in its lab. According to Apollo, the process starts with a diamond seed that's about the size of a shirt button. Then, Apollo "rains carbon onto the diamond seeds, growing new diamond, one crystal at a time." Following an alternative process, Florida-based Gemesis uses machines that create the same high-pressure and high-temperature conditions that yield diamonds in nature.

Social Acceptability of Synthetic Diamonds

Cultural tradition and societal expectations have made diamond engagement rings the betrothal gift of choice in the United States. Yet, lab-created diamonds have not yet reached the level of social acceptability of natural diamonds. Regarding Tiffany & Co.'s decision not to carry synthetic diamonds, vice president of investor relations Mark Aaron told the Wall Street Journal in 2007: "Natural diamonds fit in our stores—diamonds that come out of the ground." Nevertheless, synthetic diamond producers want to improve the positioning of their products by referring to them as "cultured diamonds" instead of as "synthetic diamonds," and the Federal Trade Commission recently declined to declare the "cultured" label misleading.

De Beers has developed a machine that can detect whether a diamond is lab-created. However, most people can't tell the difference, so a lab-created diamond could always be the buyer's little socially unacceptable secret.

Other Diamond Alternatives

Aside from lab-created diamonds, which are indeed diamonds, there are a number of diamond "simulants" on the market. Cubic zirconia is a well-known diamond substitute. Recently, moissanite, another simulant, has grown in popularity. Both of these colorless gems are available in sizes larger than one carat, whereas colorless lab-created diamonds are not. The simulants are also significantly less expensive than either natural or lab-created diamonds.

A Quick Word about Metal

Most gem-quality diamonds are set into metallic jewelry of one kind or another (rings, earrings, necklaces, etc.). Precious metal mining can have severe, negative environmental impacts. However, there are now a number of retailers, such as Brilliant Earth, that offer settings made from recycled metal. It's not just about the diamond; where you put it matters, too!


Andy Martin, ’02, plans to receive his MBA and master's in earth sciences in 2010, and develops residential energy management tools for a start-up in New York City.

You May Also Like

© Stanford University. Stanford, California 94305.